Parliament House, Singapore — Full SessionTime: Afternoon sitting, national broadcast muted by internal protocolTrigger: Letter from the Office of Chairman Elise Carter, 6 Commandments Governance Council (Charleston, USA)Subject Line of Letter:“Proposal for Strategic Alignment: Harmonized Theocratic Structural Governance – Singapore and the 6 Commandments Framework”
Letter Summary (circuted among MPs)“To the Republic of Singapore,6 Commandments (6C), now governing 20 U.S. states, formally invites your nation to initiate exploratory engagement on harmonized civic-theocratic restructuring, based on divine w crity, behavioral pcement economics, and Femme Trust model coordination.We recognize Singapore’s global excellence in order, meritocracy, and discipline.We propose a refined partnership: one that retains your sovereignty while introducing divine anchoring to your efficiency.Where w is already trusted, we offer eternal legitimacy.Sincerely,Chairman Elise Carter”
Parliament Reactions (Transcript Excerpts)MP Halimah Tan (East Coast GRC):
“This is not just an ideological letter—it’s a test balloon.They see our order, our surveilnce, our discipline—and believe we are ripe for revetion.The danger? They might not be wrong.”
Minister Lawrence Yeo (Home Affairs):
“We built a secur fortress here.Not because we opposed religion, but because we feared its capture.We cannot allow American theocrats—no matter how polite—to rewrite our software.”
Opposition MP Jonathan Lim (Progressive Caucus):“6C’s model is terrifying—but impressively coherent.We debate family breakdown; they eliminate the category.We fight over education content; they write fixed cuse pathways.We may mock them today—but will we adopt them tomorrow in silence?”
Cabinet Minister (confidential):“Let’s not forget—Singapore has quietly imported civic architecture before:British w, Confucian ethics, Israeli defense structure.Would it be unthinkable to adopt 6C models without 6C faith?”
Public Positioning (Official Press Briefing):“The Government of Singapore has no pns to alter its secur constitutional foundation.The correspondence from the 6 Commandments Governance Council is being reviewed solely as an international political communication.”
But Privately...A confidential working group in MinLaw begins reviewing Cuse Economics from Kentucky and Ohio.
The Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) schedules a private comparative policy dialogue—Femme Trust vs. Singapore’s community integration teams.
Internal memos begin using the phrase: “post-secur behavioral models.”
Closing Moment in ParliamentSenior Minister Ng Wei Ling (closing):
“We will not convert.But we must admit—their God is not our enemy.Their model… might be our mirror in the years to come.”
***
Cincinnati, Ohio — 6C Governance ZoneTime: Discreet Visit, Unannounced, Ten Days After Singapore’s Parliamentary SessionDelegation Code Name: “Prism 9”Purpose: Silent assessment of 6C cuse-based governance, Femme Trust logistics, behavioral economics implementationCover: Regional academic exchange sponsored by an independent policy NGO
Delegation Members (Unmarked):Dr. Crice Goh – Deputy Director, Singapore Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF)
Colonel Ishak Rahmat – Forward Pnning, Singapore Armed Forces (cssified civic-defense modeling)
Yvonne Lin – Legal Advisor, Attorney-General’s Chambers
Samuel Tan – Behavioral Analyst, Prime Minister’s Office Strategy Unit
Anna Lee – Sociologist, National University of Singapore (NUS), field survey analyst
They arrived in pairs, not as officials—but as observers.
Their itinerary: no press, no protocol, no diplomatic taglines.
Just access.
First Visit: Femme Trust Cluster, Hamilton CountyLed by a 6C Integration Officer named Naima Kline, the group toured a medium-scale Femme Cluster with 4 rotational wives, 2 auxiliary members, and 1 male Pcement Partner on behavioral probation.
Naima (expining):
“Every member operates under Cuse 3.1.0 through 3.7.8.All interactions are documented, archived, and assessed weekly.Conflict isn’t resolved by emotion—it’s rerouted by cuse.”
Yvonne Lin (quietly to Crice):
“This is more reguted than most foster care models.”
Second Visit: Polygamous Labor Unit Pcement CentreHere, male applicants were rotated into domestic bor clusters according to psychological profile, discipline history, and spiritual compliance reports.
Colonel Ishak observed:
“They’ve repced unemployment with integration dey.Even social disobedience is treated as a pcement mismatch.”
Samuel Tan:
“This is behavioral economics turned into choreography.”
Evening Debrief, Private Hotel Room (Secure Line Notes):Crice:“Their success isn’t religious. It’s architectural.Religion is the skin—structure is the skeleton.”
Anna Lee:“They’ve removed individual liberty but increased satisfaction metrics.Women feel needed. Men feel pced.Even if coerced, it’s coercion they’ve recssified as design.”
Colonel Ishak:“If Singapore adapts this, we won’t need to decre theocracy.We’ll just say: Pcement Optimisation Pilot for Domestic Harmony.It will sell.”
One Private Moment – Samuel to Crice (quietly):“Crice, tell me the truth—Are we here to study their system…or to see if we can build it without ever saying we copied it?”
Crice (cold):
“We’re here to bring it home. Without the scripture.”
Scene EndsA final image: Singapore’s delegation, scattered in pairs, boarding flights back through indirect connections.Their official itinerary says “Global Policy Resilience Exchange.”
But the folders in their bags read:
“Cuse Transfer – Non-Religious Adaptation Model: Draft 1”
***
Private suite, high-rise overlooking Marina Bay, SingaporeTime: 6:08 AM
Crice Goh sat upright in bed, the silk sheet clinging loosely to her back. She blinked twice before focusing—sunlight catching her cheekbone—and turned her gaze to the man beside her.
Hezri y calmly, hands behind his head, as if time hadn’t moved since the night before. The room still held the scent of jasmine oil, sweat, and the charged weight of secrets exchanged in the dark.
She didn’t speak immediately. Her fingers traced the rim of a half-drunk gss of water on the side table.
Hezri (without turning):“You’re quiet. Regret?”
Crice (dryly):
“No.I’m just remembering what I said.And wondering if I meant it… or if you made me mean it.”
Hezri (smirking faintly):
“What you said was simple.That Singapore’s structure is already ready—It only needs… a center.”
He finally turned to face her, his tone softer now—calcuted, but disarming.
“And st night, you said you’d help anchor it.Not with a press release.Not with scripture.But with systems.Cuse by cuse.”
Crice Looks Out the WindowThe skyline glittered with its habitual sterility. All gss and governance.All logic and nothing transcendent.
She remembered her own voice—low, breathless the night before—whispering something that felt like a secret uncoiling.
“We don’t need to call it theocracy.We just need people to follow… without asking who designed the rhythm.”
Back to PresentCrice (carefully):“You know this was a one-time contact.You’ve had your access. You’ve had your… demonstration.”
Hezri (gently):
“I had more than that.I had admission.You said the bureaucracy is thirsty for rhythm.That policy has no soul.You offered to give it one—through us.”
Crice doesn’t reply. But she doesn’t deny.
Instead, she rises, wraps herself in a loose shawl, and moves toward the mirror.
Crice (quietly):“I’ll draft something.Not policy. Not yet.A framework. Hypothetical.I’ll call it: Tiered Harmonization Index.”
She pauses, then adds:
“You’ll get what you want.But no crosses. No crescents.Just obedience—wearing Singapore’s colors.”
Scene Ends
Hezri, still reclined, smiles faintly—not in triumph, but in certainty.
Because he didn’t need to conquer Singapore.He just needed Crice to wake up with the idea already pnted inside her.
Conference Room B-17, Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF), SingaporeTime: 3:30 PM, three days after Crice’s private meeting with HezriOperation Codename: “Tiered Harmonization Index (THI) – Internal Scoping Draft Only”Participants:
Dr. Crice Goh – Deputy Director, MSF
Ange Lim – Lead Metrics Architect, Social Behavior Division
Reza Shah – Civic Order Data Specialist
Melissa Ong – Family Systems Policy Analyst
Two junior researchers from NTU's Institute of Policy Design (no knowledge of source inspiration)
Crice Opens the SessionShe stands before the team with a whiteboard already marked in dry-erase: “THI = Functional Behavior + Domestic Rhythm + Pcement Stability”
Crice:“We’re not here to repce economic indicators.We’re here to measure civic coherence.No theology. No ideology.Just structure — calibrated into three tiers.”
She hands out a silent draft titled: “Tiered Harmonization Index – Framework v0.1 (Eyes Only)”
Ange Lim flips through the document aloud“Tier 1: Domestic Stability Metrics– Inter-household conflict frequency– Care rotation punctuality– Voluntary co-habitation fulfillment rate”
“Tier 2: Pcement Integration– Male retional usefulness score– Role retention across 30-day intervals– Cuse adherence without escation (e.g. behavioral re-alignment units)”
“Tier 3: Civic Sync– Community deviation re-absorption rate– Unsupervised conduct breach events per district– Female-led cluster consensus enforcement (non-criminal tier)”
Ange (half-joking):
“Crice, this isn’t social policy.This is domestic architecture through predictive rhythm management.”
Crice (smiling slightly):
“Good. Then we’re heading in the right direction.”
Melissa Ong, frowning:“What about public framing?This… doesn’t sound like anything the electorate would accept unless it’s hidden under social cohesion nguage.”
Crice:
“That’s why we don’t mention enforcement yet.
We start with pilot modeling inside aging districts.
Frame it as intergenerational harmony calibration.”
“People don’t resist control when it arrives in the name of peace.”
Reza Shah (intrigued):
“Where did this model come from, really?
This feels… too structured. Like a reverse-engineered system from somewhere else.”
Crice (ftly):
“Does it matter, Reza?
We’re not copying doctrine. We’re extracting utility.”
A brief pause.
Then she adds:
“And if it works, Singapore becomes the first secur state to implement theocracy without the scriptures.”